Using the Rorschach properly in practice and research.

Proper use of the Rorschach Inkblot Method (RIM) in practice and research requires (a) well-founded expectations concerning what the RIM should be expected to do, and (b) appropriate methods for exami…

Expertise judiciaire : test projectif
Weiner, I. B. (2000). Using the Rorschach properly in practice and research.. J Clin Psychol, 56(3), 435-8; discussion 441-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(200003)56:3<435::aid-jclp17>3.0.co;2-l

The Rorschach test in clinical diagnosis: a critical review, with a backward look at Garfield (1947).

The present article comments on a classic study by Garfield (1947) then reviews research on the Rorschach and psychiatric diagnoses. Despite a few positive findings, the Rorschach has demonstrated lit…

Expertise judiciaire : test projectif
Wood, J. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., Garb, H. N., & Nezworski, M. T. (2000). The Rorschach test in clinical diagnosis: a critical review, with a backward look at Garfield (1947).. J Clin Psychol, 56(3), 395-430; discussion 431-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(200003)56:3<395::aid-jclp15>3.0.co;2-o

Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: the Multi-Motive Grid (MMG).

In this article, we introduce the Multi-Motive Grid (MMG), a new diagnostic tool to measure motives with respect to their hope and fear components. The MMG combines features of the Thematic Appercepti…

Expertise judiciaire : test projectif
Sokolowski, K., Schmalt, H. D., Langens, T. A., & Puca, R. M. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: the Multi-Motive Grid (MMG).. J Pers Assess, 74(1), 126-45. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA740109

Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales.

The study compared the predictive accuracy of three sex offender risk-assessment measures: the RRASOR (Hanson, 1997), Thornton's SACJ-Min (Grubin, 1998), and a new scale, Static-99, created by combini…

Outils structurés d'évaluation du risque de récidive/dangerosité
Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales.. Law Hum Behav, 24(1), 119-36. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005482921333

Mixed group validation: a method to address the limitations of criterion group validation in research on malingering detection.

Mixed group validation (MGV) is offered as an alternative to criterion group validation (CGV) to estimate the true positive and false positive rates of tests and other diagnostic signs. CGV requires p…

Test psychométrisque et malingering
Frederick, R. I. (2000). Mixed group validation: a method to address the limitations of criterion group validation in research on malingering detection.. Behav Sci Law, 18(6), 693-718. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.432

The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.

After defining the role of expert witness, the article reviews the basics of courtroom testimony under the rubrics of (a) truth (presenting under oath only that testimony that one can "swear to," to a…

Tests psychométriques administrés aux accusés par les experts psychologues — usages, validité et limites
Gutheil, T. G. (2000). The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci, 37(2), 137-44.

Differential patterns of responding among three groups of chronic, psychotic, forensic outpatients.

Elements of response style were examined among three groups of chronic, psychotic, forensic patients: paranoid schizophrenics (N = 89); undifferentiated-disorganized schizophrenics (N = 38); and schiz…

Expertise judiciaire : test projectif
Bannatyne, L. A., Gacono, C. B., & Greene, R. L. (1999). Differential patterns of responding among three groups of chronic, psychotic, forensic outpatients.. J Clin Psychol, 55(12), 1553-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199912)55:12<1553::aid-jclp12>3.0.co;2-1

The Rorschach Inkblot Test: a case of overstatement?

In the 1940s, inflated claims were often made regarding the Rorschach Inkblot Test. Over half a century later, overstatements regarding the test are still common. The present article identifies proble…

Expertise judiciaire : test projectif
Wood, J. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (1999). The Rorschach Inkblot Test: a case of overstatement?. Assessment, 6(4), 341-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600405

What the Rorschach can do for you: incremental validity in clinical applications.

Psychological assessment instruments vary in how much structure they provide and the extent to which their meaning and purpose are apparent. The Rorschach Inkblot Method (RIM) is a relatively unstruct…

Expertise judiciaire : test projectif
Weiner, I. B. (1999). What the Rorschach can do for you: incremental validity in clinical applications.. Assessment, 6(4), 327-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600404

Behavioral science foundations of the Rorschach test: research and clinical applications.

Never without its critics, the Rorschach Test continues to be widely used in clinical settings. The test continues to be criticized vigorously. Rorschach critics appear to fall into two broad groups: …

Expertise judiciaire : test projectif
Acklin, M. W. (1999). Behavioral science foundations of the Rorschach test: research and clinical applications.. Assessment, 6(4), 319-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600403

Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings.

A call is issued for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic (but not research) settings. The moratorium should last until we have determined which Rorschach sco…

Expertise judiciaire : test projectif
Garb, H. N. (1999). Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings.. Assessment, 6(4), 313-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600402

Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version.

This study evaluated the predictive validity of the HCR-20 (Historical, Clinical, and Risk Management) violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV). Files …

Outils structurés d'évaluation du risque de récidive/dangerosité
Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R., Nicholls, T. L., & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version.. J Consult Clin Psychol, 67(6), 917-30. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.67.6.917
Loading…
Loading the web debug toolbar…
Attempt #