Plateforme de veille scientifique et de revue de littérature basée sur PubMed
Alimenté par : Madeline Desmurs
Cette application est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique permettant d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocole, variables, résultats), et de constituer une synthèse structurée pour faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature.
Dernière synchronisation : 18/06/2026
Psychiatr Psychol Law . 2026;33 (1) :125-138
Assessing the credibility of psychological problems in forensic evaluations is crucial. The Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) is becoming a valuable symptom validity test (SVT) worldwide and has been validated in over 15 languages. This study evaluates the German IOP-29 and fills a gap by replicating a study of Akca, Tepedelen, et al. We analysed 384 IOP-29 protocols from 128 German-speaking adults (range = 18-87 years) under three conditions: honest, random and feigned responses (post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD; depression; schizophrenia). Statistical analyses showed that the False Disorder Probability Score (FDS) effectively discriminated between honest and feigned responses (Hedges = 3.90), with a sensitivity of .91 and a specificity of .95 at an FDS cut-off value of ≥.50. A new index for detecting careless or random responses also showed promising results. This study confirms the utility of the IOP-29 in the German-speaking population and supports its cross-cultural applicability.