Plateforme de veille scientifique et de revue de littérature basée sur PubMed

Alimenté par : Madeline Desmurs

Cette application est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique permettant d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocole, variables, résultats), et de constituer une synthèse structurée pour faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature.

Dernière synchronisation : 18/06/2026

Tests psychométriques administrés aux accusés par les experts psychologues — usages, validité et limites

outils standardisés (échelles de personnalité, échelles de risque, tests projectifs) utilisés par les psychologues pour évaluer un accusé dans le cadre d'une expertise judiciaire (responsabilité pénale, dangerosité, aptitude à comparaître).

6 articles disponibles

"PCL-R" AND "validity"
"MMPI" AND "forensic"
"Rorschach" AND "forensic assessment"
"HCR-20" AND "accuracy"
"psychopathy checklist" AND "defendants"
"psychometric testing" AND "defendants"
"forensic assessment" AND "validity"
"personality testing" AND "criminal defendants"
"psychological testing" AND "court"
"forensic psychometrics" AND "limitations"
"psychological evaluation" AND "offenders"
"personality assessment" AND "criminal responsibility"
"risk assessment tools" AND "accuracy"
"structured risk assessment" AND "offenders"
"psychometric tools" AND "bias"
"forensic testing" AND "cultural bias"
"malingering" AND "psychological testing"
"response distortion" AND "forensic evaluation"
"psychological testing" AND "admissibility"
"expert testimony" AND "psychometric evidence"

Nodewise Predictability in Cross-Sectional Data Does Not Outperform Mechanical Totals in Predicting Sexual Reoffending.

This study compares the predictive accuracy of sexual reoffending using dynamic risk factors' sum score (mechanical totals) and nodewise predictability, a model accounting for their interrelationships…

Tests psychométriques administrés aux accusés par les experts psychologues — usages, validité et limites Test psychométrisque et malingering
Jonkers, B. o. t. h. . D., Babchishin, K. M., Bouman, Y. H. A., Burger, J., Sjerps, M., & van, d. e. n. . B. e. r. g. . J. W. (2026). Nodewise Predictability in Cross-Sectional Data Does Not Outperform Mechanical Totals in Predicting Sexual Reoffending.. Assessment, 33(5), 834-844. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251350552
01/07/2026 Lire →

Personality Assessment in Legal Contexts: Introduction to the Special Issue.

This special issue addresses a major gap in the literature by providing comprehensive, credible reviews of the psychometric evidence for and legal status of some of the most commonly-used psychologica…

Tests psychométriques administrés aux accusés par les experts psychologues — usages, validité et limites Expertise judiciaire : test projectif
Neal, T. M. S., Sellbom, M., & de, R. u. i. t. e. r. . C. (2022). Personality Assessment in Legal Contexts: Introduction to the Special Issue.. J Pers Assess, 104(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2033248
01/01/2022 Lire →

Variations in reliability and validity do not influence judge, attorney, and mock juror decisions about psychological expert evidence.

OBJECTIVE: We tested whether the reliability and validity of psychological testing underlying an expert's opinion influenced judgments made by judges, attorneys, and mock jurors.HYPOTHESES: We predict…

Tests psychométriques administrés aux accusés par les experts psychologues — usages, validité et limites
Chorn, J. A., & Kovera, M. B. (2019). Variations in reliability and validity do not influence judge, attorney, and mock juror decisions about psychological expert evidence.. Law Hum Behav, 43(6), 542-557. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000345
01/12/2019 Lire →

A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists.

Clinical psychologists are frequently called on to testify in court regarding mental health issues in civil or criminal cases. One of the legal criteria by which admissibility of testimony is determin…

Tests psychométriques administrés aux accusés par les experts psychologues — usages, validité et limites
Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists.. J Pers Assess, 87(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_07
01/08/2006 Lire →

A consideration of challenges to psychological assessment instruments used in forensic settings: Rorschach as exemplar.

In this brief primer, we provide an outline of key issues that will help psychologists organize and prepare their expert testimony. These issues include the need to obtain essential sources of researc…

Tests psychométriques administrés aux accusés par les experts psychologues — usages, validité et limites Expertise judiciaire : test projectif
Hilsenroth, M. J., & Stricker, G. (2004). A consideration of challenges to psychological assessment instruments used in forensic settings: Rorschach as exemplar.. J Pers Assess, 83(2), 141-52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8302_08
01/10/2004 Lire →

The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.

After defining the role of expert witness, the article reviews the basics of courtroom testimony under the rubrics of (a) truth (presenting under oath only that testimony that one can "swear to," to a…

Tests psychométriques administrés aux accusés par les experts psychologues — usages, validité et limites
Gutheil, T. G. (2000). The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci, 37(2), 137-44.
01/01/2000 Lire →
Loading…
Loading the web debug toolbar…
Attempt #